Supreme Court of India  ·  1950 – 2024  ·  35,000+ Judgments

Draft legal submissions
grounded in verified precedents

Research directly from the Supreme Court judgment database. Identify legal issues, surface on-point precedents, and receive structured drafts — written arguments, petitions, opinions, or summaries — ready for review and filing.

Written Arguments · Draft Preview

It is respectfully submitted that the termination of the Appellant without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 renders the same void ab initio. This Court in Workmen of Firestone Tyre v. Management (1973) 1 SCC 813 held that a retrenchment that does not comply with the mandatory conditions precedent under Section 25F is illegal and the workman is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.

State Bank of India vs N. Sundara Money
(1976) 1 SCC 822  ·  Bench: 3 Judges
Pipraich Sugar Mills Ltd. vs Workmen
(1961) AIR SC 1404  ·  Constitutional Bench
35,000+Judgments indexed
1950 – 2024Full coverage
4 output typesArguments, petitions, opinions, summaries
SCC & AIRStandard citation format

What it does

Comprehensive legal research
in a single tool

Precedent research

Search across 35,000 Supreme Court judgments. The system identifies the most relevant rulings for your specific legal issues — not keyword matches, but reasoning-level relevance.

Issue identification

Describes the precise legal questions your matter raises — the area of law, the statutory provisions involved, and the constitutional or common-law framework applicable.

Structured drafting

Produces properly structured legal documents — written arguments, writ petitions, legal opinions, and case summaries — in the formal language of Indian courts.

Citation-grounded arguments

Every argument includes the case title, citation reference (SCC / AIR), and the ratio decidendi applied to your facts. No unverified propositions.

Era-specific research

Restrict precedent search to a specific period — useful where recent constitutional amendments or landmark overrulings have changed the legal position.

Multiple document formats

Choose the output type before generating: written arguments, petition draft, legal opinion, or concise case summary. Each follows the appropriate structural convention.

Process

From case facts to filed-quality draft

01

Describe the facts

Enter a clear, factual description of the dispute — parties, relevant events, and the core legal question. The more specific, the better the output.

02

Legal issues are extracted

The system identifies up to five distinct legal questions arising from the facts — each framed as a precise legal proposition with the applicable statutory reference.

03

Precedents are retrieved

Thousands of Supreme Court judgments are searched. Only rulings whose reasoning directly addresses your issues are selected — ranked by legal relevance, not keyword frequency.

04

Draft is generated

Arguments are structured issue-by-issue, each supported by cited precedent and its application to your facts. Output is formatted for immediate use or further editing.

Drafting Tool

Research & draft your case

Your draft will appear here

Describe your case on the left and click Generate