Generic AI predicts words. VakilAI retrieves law. Access a context-aware legal engine grounded in 468,000+ verified Supreme Court and High Court judgments from 1950 to 2026. Built for precision-critical drafting where hallucination is not an option.
It is respectfully submitted that the termination of the Appellant without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 renders the same void ab initio. This Court in Workmen of Firestone Tyre v. Management (1973) 1 SCC 813 held that a retrenchment that does not comply with the mandatory conditions precedent under Section 25F is illegal and the workman is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.
Real Data, Real Law
While basic AI tools are trained on scattered internet data, VakilAI is built on a structured primary-source database. Every case retrieved is a complete judicial record, ensuring your citations are not just plausible, but legally accurate.
"The doctrine of stare decisis is the very basis on which the judicial system in our country works. A decision which has been followed for a long period of time should not be disturbed..."
The problem with generic AI
Hallucination is a feature of how large language models work — they predict plausible-sounding text. In most domains, this is inconvenient. In law, it is professionally dangerous. A fabricated citation filed before a court can result in adverse orders, Bar Council proceedings, or irreparable harm to your client.
A 2023 U.S. case saw a law firm sanctioned after ChatGPT-generated briefs cited six non-existent cases. Indian courts are no different — a fictitious precedent is worse than none at all.
Built for Indian courts
Not keyword matching — the system understands the legal reasoning in your facts and surfaces SC judgments where the court addressed the same principles. 43,000 rulings searched in seconds.
Every case reference — title, year, volume, page, bench strength — is extracted from the real judgment. VakilAI cannot cite a case that isn't in the database. No fabrication is possible.
Convenience notes, written arguments, legal opinions, case summaries, court applications, and civil plaints — each structured for Indian superior courts, using proper legal English and formatting.
Narrow your search to a specific time window — useful where a constitutional amendment, legislative change, or landmark overruling has shifted the legal position. Control the bench you argue before.
Export any draft as a formatted .docx Word document or plain .txt — ready to open in your chamber's word processor, edit, and file. No copy-pasting from a browser window.
Junior advocates preparing research memos, seniors drafting written submissions, law students studying SC reasoning, and in-house counsel preparing opinions — all use cases, one tool.
How it works
Enter a clear, factual description of the dispute — parties, relevant events, and the core legal question. The more specific, the better the output.
The system identifies up to five distinct legal questions arising from the facts — each framed as a precise legal proposition with the applicable statutory reference.
Thousands of Supreme Court judgments are searched. Only rulings whose reasoning directly addresses your issues are selected — ranked by legal relevance, not keyword frequency.
Choose the document type you need — convenience note, written arguments, legal opinion, case summary, or court application. Each is generated on demand in the appropriate Indian legal format.
Drafting Tool
Use your Google account to continue. Access is free for authorised users.
Continue with GoogleYour session is private and secure. We do not store your documents.